Post by John LarkinI loved sci-fi as a kid, but find it lame and boring now. But I hated
classics, Jane Austin and Shakespeare sorts of stuff, but love it now.
The only thing more scary to a HS English teacher than a teenager who
isn't into Shakespeare is one who's very big into it.
There's a better-than-average chance they're going to be a movie star
and a better-than-average chance they'll end up a HS teacher and they'll
probably remember you either way..
Post by John LarkinFortunately, I can still design electronics. I visualize basic
circuits but have to draw them to really think about them. I go
through absurd numbers of grid pads and uniball pens. The Amazon
Basics pads are pretty good.
LT Spice is a great aid to thinking.
When I was 30, I had designed hundreds of PCBs and could draw any of
their schematics from memory. I can't do that any more. No big deal,
they are on my computer now.
I think human designers may have some kind of elegance/consistency
internal rulecheck independent of the internal electrical rulecheck;
that "good" circuits tend to have a certain "look" about them,
independent of their electrical validity. Our brain's ability to do
electrical rulechecks at more than a cursory level is pretty poor.
In the larger-than-electrons-in-Universe state space there are many
circuits appealing to the first rulecheck that are electrical nonsense
and vice-versa, but it may be that the number of "ugly" but
exceptional-performing circuits in that state space, that completely
fail the first human test but pass the physics test with flying colors,
greatly outnumbers the set of circuits that meets both checks.
However a human will have extreme difficulty finding them, the implied
network analysis problem we're discussing is likely NP hard/complete so
can't yet be brute-forced by machine, and AI often has trouble
optimizing even known circuits, much less coming up with novel ones.
So even if I'm right I think the overwhelming majority of "beautiful
scum"-type circuits are just lost to the curse of dimensionality.